Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 16: 3977-3989, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38107088

RESUMO

Introduction: Millions of deaths and co-morbidities have been brought on by the COVID-19 epidemic worldwide. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ failure, and death can result from the condition in some people. The disease's course can range from a moderate upper respiratory tract infection to severe pneumonia. Numerous reports have been made on the occurrence of pneumothorax in COVID-19 ICU patients, particularly in those who are receiving invasive ventilation. This study assesses factors associated with pneumothorax among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ICU patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: A case-control study design was employed from August 1, 2022, to August 31, 2022, GC, with a sample size of 281, where cases are 94 and controls are 187. A pre-tested structured quantitative tool was used to collect data on ODK and export it to SPSS version 26 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were presented using text and tables. The association between variables was analyzed with binary logistic regression. A statistical significance was declared at a p-value of 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval. Assumptions like model fitness and multicollinearity were checked to be satisfied. Results: A total of 281 (94 cases and 187 controls) patient charts were carefully reviewed. After adjustment for possible confounders in multivariate analysis, ARDS (AOR = 0.214, 95% CI (0.088, 0.519), P value =0.001) and invasive ventilation (AOR = 0.311, 95% CI (0.121, 0.796), P value =0.015) had a significant association with pneumothorax. Conclusion: Despite the introduction of preventive breathing methods, pneumothorax is still a frequent and deadly consequence in COVID-19 patients with ARDS. ARDS and invasive mechanical ventilation were found to be significantly associated with the development of pneumothorax. Health facilities should be well equipped with recent medical equipment in intensive care units and with well-trained and organized manpower.

2.
BMC Pulm Med ; 23(1): 85, 2023 Mar 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36915064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have indicated that hospitalized COVID-19 patients benefit from anticoagulation therapy in terms of survival; however, there is an ongoing controversy over the optimum anticoagulant dosage. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation and those who received therapeutic anticoagulation. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the impact of anticoagulation dosage in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Ethiopia. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, and it was assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression and covariate-adjusted Cox Proportional Hazard model. For critical and severe COVID-19 patients, subgroup analyses were performed using multivariable binary logistic regression model and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULT: A total of 472 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were included in this study, of whom 235 (49.8%) received therapeutic anticoagulation and 237 (50.2%) received prophylactic dose. The demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were roughly similar between the groups. After adjustment for several confounders, in critical COVID-19 subgroup, therapeutic dose of anticoagulation was significantly associated with a higher inpatient mortality (AOR 2.27, 95% CI, 1.18-4.35, p = 0.013), whereas in severe COVID-19 subgroup, anticoagulation dosage was not associated with inpatient mortality (OR, 1.02, 95% CI, 0.45 - 2.33, p = 0.958). In severe COVID-19 patient group however, the incidence of thrombosis was slightly lower in the therapeutic group as compared with prophylactic group although the difference was not statistically significant (AOR 0.15, 95% CI, 0.02 - 1.20, p = 0.073). Although there were only six major bleeding events in this study, all these were recorded from patients in the therapeutic subgroup, making the difference statistically significant (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Although this study is limited by its observational design, our results are not consistent with current recommendations on anti-coagulation dose for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, necessitating the need for RCT in resource limited settings.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Etiópia/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...